Editorial corrections
Found an error in a guide? Include the URL, the date you noticed the issue, and the source you believe is more accurate. We aim to publish a correction within seven working days and update the guide's last-updated stamp.
Reader-reported factual errors
If a guide references an operator that has changed its terms, rules, or eligibility list, tell us. Operator changes are the most common reason guides go out of date.
Operator issues
Fantoss is an editorial publication; we cannot resolve operator issues. For account, KYC, withdrawal, or contest issues, contact the operator through the verified channels listed in our customer care guide.
Press and partnerships
For press inquiries and partnership opportunities, use the contact page and include the publication, the topic, and the deadline.
The editorial desk's commitment
The editorial desk revisits this guide every quarter and after every material event. The commitment is to keep the guide accurate, useful, and free of fabricated facts. Where evidence is incomplete, we say so on the page and date the gap. The commitment is the most useful source of trust in the publication.
The editorial desk also commits to a fast corrections process. Reader-reported errors are reviewed within seven working days; confirmed errors are corrected within seven working days. The corrections process is the most useful source of trust in the publication.
What this guide does not promise
This guide does not promise winning teams, ownership percentages, or any rate of return. No legitimate source can promise any of those, and a guide that does is a tip sheet pretending to be editorial work. The promise this guide makes is methodology: a structured way to read the match, a captain logic that survives a season, and a verification checklist that protects your account.
The methodology promise is what makes this guide useful across many matches. A tip-sheet promise is useful for one match; a methodology promise is useful for a season. The methodology promise is the most useful single contribution this guide can make.
How to give feedback
Use the contact page to send feedback, corrections, or suggestions. Include the URL, the date, and the specific change you would like to see. The feedback inbox is the most useful source of improvements to the guide; the editorial desk reads every message.
Feedback is also the most useful source of new guides. The most-read guides on the site are the ones that address the questions readers actually ask. The feedback inbox is the most useful source of new editorial directions.